‏إظهار الرسائل ذات التسميات Preparing. إظهار كافة الرسائل
‏إظهار الرسائل ذات التسميات Preparing. إظهار كافة الرسائل

الثلاثاء، 22 مايو 2012

Identifying The Differences Between Preparing A Forensic Report For A Fraud And A Confiscation

Very often criminal cases need the expertise of a forensic accountant to assist. They analyse and present financial information in a way that a court can readily understand. Frequently their task is to assist the defence lawyers to respond to the allegations being made.

The prosecution often brings a case in a fraud matter such as a tax fraud or a confiscation of assets using the Proceeds of Crime Act legislation following another conviction that involves a large amount of financial data. It is usual for the case summary, or statement of information as it may be called in a confiscation, to be written and presented by persons such as an accredited financial investigator. These are often employed as police officers and may receive training in a number of areas including investigating, interviewing and evidence handling. Some will receive rudimentary accounting instruction but most will not. It is very rare for the prosecution to employ expert accountants to present financial data owing to budgetary constraints. However, this results in the need for the criminal defence to examine the allegations in very great detail as, more often than not, they will include errors and inappropriate conclusions.

In the case of a fraud, it will usually be clear that there is a case to answer. The police will investigate financial losses and in many cases be able to present a modus for the crime that can be readily understood. However, such is the partisan nature of the approach adopted by the regulatory authorities that they will often draw rather zealous or inappropriate conclusions from their evidence. The forensic accountant must consider all aspects of the case and present the information in an independent and unbiased way. Sometimes this can result in the defendant being shown in a more adverse light, but mostly will lead to a tempering of the prosecution's case.

On the other hand the treatment of a confiscation by the authorities can result in the presentation of wholly unreasonable demands for a person to lose all their wealth and suffer lengthy additional prison terms for committing even modest crimes for which they have already received a punishment. The confiscation regime has often been called draconian and presents a much stronger need for a capable forensic accountant to become involved.

The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 ensured that criminals involved in not only money laundering and drug dealing were targeted, but also any criminal who could be deemed to have enjoyed a criminal lifestyle. Unfortunately, the criterion for a criminal lifestyle are very easily met!

The prosecution continue to use accredited financial investigators to estimate the extent of a person's criminal lifestyle, without the benefit of having to prove matters to within "reasonable doubt" as is usual for criminal matters. What is more, the legislation allows sweeping assumptions to be made, with the onus on the defendant to prove otherwise. This is why the defence is tasked with a difficult job and hence the need for the assistance of forensic accountants.

An expert may therefore be used to clarify the framework of a complex fraud, presenting the evidence in an understandable fashion. It can point to flaws in the allegations being made but can equally present a poorer picture for the defendant. More often than not, in a confiscation matter the expert accountant will reduce the extent that the criminal benefit has been estimated as by the prosecution, pointing out flaws in the approach and mistakes in the calculations.

In both frauds and confiscations there is a strong argument for an increased use of expert forensic accountants. This would mean increased funding for the police and prosecution authorities, but might mean a corresponding reduction in the amount of work that the defence is tasked with, which at the end of the day is also funded from public money.

Mark Jenner provides services as a forensic accountant based in York and throughout the UK. He is a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants and a Certified Fraud Examiner and has a Masters Degree in Fraud Management. He specialises as a criminal defence and tax fraud accountant.


View the original article here

الأربعاء، 9 مايو 2012

Estate Planning Attorney: Preparing for a Meeting

You don't technically need to do anything to prepare for a meeting with an estate planning attorney. Just having taken the step to set up a meeting is more than many people take, and you should be proud and confident in your decision to move forward with responsible financial progress. One of the worst things a person can do to their heirs is to leave their assets in disarray. More often than not, it leads to infighting, resentment, and family problems that can last a long time. You can avoid all of that by making specific plans ahead of time. While you can think through specific decisions with your lawyer, here are some things you may want to discuss prior to your meeting.

Guardianship

If you have kids under the age of 18, one of the first things you need to think about is who will act as their guardian should you be unable to. So many parents fail to think of this, and it can have dire consequences for the child. You don't want your child to wind up as a ward of the state, moving through foster homes, and experiencing a very unstable life after you're gone. No one likes the idea of preparing for the worst, but you should do so. Think about who will take care of your kids before meeting with your estate planning attorney, as this is one decision he'll be unable to help you with.

Finances

If you were ever to reach the point where you couldn't handle your own finances, who would you want put in charge of them? Some feel comfortable entrusting financial control to an estate planning attorney or another professional in the field. Others want control handed over to a relative. This is up to you, but it is another important thing you need to think about. When you're healthy and loving life, it seems nearly absurd to consider such an unlikely scenario. But it happens all the time. Make arrangements while you're of sound mind.

Your Heirs

What will become of your money, assets, and property after you've died? For those who have none of these things (and there are certainly more than a few people who can say this), it is of little concern. But if you have savings and ownership of property, you need to consider who will receive it should you pass away. This is something you can discuss with an estate planning attorney, but it is a decision you'll ultimately have to make on your own.

Are you in need of a estate planning attorney Georgetown DE? To make arrangements to meet an experienced professional, please see the following: http://www.bettsdelawarelawyers.com/.


View the original article here

الجمعة، 4 مايو 2012

Personal Injury Lawyer - Preparing for a Case

If you're in a situation where you may need to hire a personal injury lawyer, you may be curious to know how the case is to unfold. While every case is different, it is helpful to go into the process with some relevant information about the "typical" case, which can give you the right mindset moving forward. A lot of people, once injured in an accident due to negligence of another party, aren't really sure how to proceed. Having the other party's lawyers tell you that you have no case and that you should accept their offer of a settlement does little to quell the confusion. Here are some things you should know about how a case works.

Do You Need an Attorney?

Not always. Though legal representation never hurts, there are instances where hiring a personal injury lawyer will actually be a detriment to your bottom line. If the opposing insurance company is offering a healthy settlement, there may be very little wiggle room in that number. Hiring an attorney might be a way to raise the sum to some degree, but if the difference between the original number and the final number goes into the attorney's pocket, what good have you accomplished? This is why it helps to talk to an attorney who is serious about helping his clients and isn't just out for his next paycheck.

Mediation

Many people have the idea that hiring a personal injury lawyer means going to trial. This is rarely the case. Trials are expensive, lengthy, and unpredictable. Attorneys on both sides of the aisle have an interest in avoiding them. Unless there is serious money involved and the two sides are very far apart on the number, mediation is a more likely path to take. This involves negotiating directly with the insurance adjuster, which is the final step for many cases. Of course, if nothing is resolved in these negotiations, the case may proceed to trial.

Don't Assume Victory

Though your personal injury lawyer may be confident and you may feel as though you are making a very compelling case for compensation, don't assume that you have won before a judgment comes back. Some clients have made the mistake of not having their insurance company pay their medical bills or staying out of work longer than they might have otherwise, with the expectation that their lost wages would be paid by the judgment. Do everything you can to keep up with your financial obligations, as no case is ever a slam dunk.

With a personal injury lawyer Athens GA victims are far more likely to receive a favorable settlement for their pain and suffering. Your case deserves nothing less than the experience of the firm at http://mcdonaldcodycook.com/.


View the original article here